User blog comment:Jackofalltrades9X/Enemies of the Holy War/@comment-124.83.31.223-20150916141956/@comment-124.83.31.223-20150919153007

Ruskatia was a Great Hero? Like I said, it's fine for a Eiyuu to be able to fight. I reprised that part of my argument since, if they're the equivalent of an Emperor, then their abilities can help support combat too. In fact, mentioning Ruskatia just highlights my argument of Eiyuu being meant to lead. She amassed a great number of followers and waged war with an enemy tribe. It's nothing decisive, but it's line with the theme of Eiyuus/Emperors. If we compared that short anecdote with how the Water Hero participated in Sternbild's civil war, there's a stark difference in the imagery. With what sparse details there are of Ruskatia's story, nothing really tangible can be said of how she fought, but she gives off the image of a military leader who led her army from the front. The Water Hero, on the other hand, was the opposite. He was the spear head of his side. He and his party cut a swathe through the royal forces when they tried to take down one of Tomboy Princess' allies. Not fair to compare, since we don't know that much about Ruskatia, right? Hence why it wasn't helpful to bring her up at all.

It's not false that a Great Hero doesn't require Hero first, hence it could be? But that doesn't mean there's any good reason why that should be the assumption. I could be wearing a green shirt or a white shirt right now, but there's no foundation for deciding which would be a better guess. In this conversation, the only example within the story you've provided as a support so far is Ruskatia, but that was flimsy evidence at best. It can't even contradict my point as Emperor class monsters are terribly powerful on their own as well.

Look, I've addessed your points, why haven't you addressed mine? Do you think, for some reason, that there's anything wrong with what I said? Then state it. You call my points conjectures, but you're no different. I've accepted your points and addressed each one. If there were any problems in what I said, I conceded to them and fixed my argument.

You may be exasperated with this, but you're not being fair or respectful towards me. I'm trying to clarify my reasoning so that there may not be any confusion and that I may be easily understood, but you haven't even tried to do the same for me. Give some form of proper reasoning as to why you think a Great Hero may be an upgrade to a Hero. Give me some indication in the story that this may be the case and, if I find no fault in your reasoning, I'll drop it.