Talk:Day 211-220/Day 217/@comment-83.86.205.207-20160101090011/@comment-124.83.16.225-20160101185601

That's what I felt, but I stuck with it anyway with the intent that someone else would standardize it all over time. It's because sometimes the author just refers to stuff with the kanji name rather than the kana in the text. When he uses the kana, sometimes it's directly in the sentence or it's used in the rubi. So I left it 1:1 until someone decides on a consensus for translation there.

Is that last bit referring to the original guy?