Talk:Day 121-130/@comment-134.114.95.24-20150305163905/@comment-207.246.19.168-20150306021945

Dyonnisos is correct it does stand for Dungeons and Dragons. Lancer, I was only considering what he has done once he woke up as a goblin after he died when I made my analysis of his alignment, which I am still of the same opinion as I was in my second post when I listed my reasons. From the point which he was reborn as a goblin and on he has done many vile acts like I stated. I also forgot to mention that  I think that he is a cannibal. In one of the earlier days I believe that he killed some other goblins then ate their flesh (canninbalism in the eyes of D&D rules is a vile act). As I mention in D&D alignment is dependent on someones actions not someones intentions. So even if acharacter tortured an npc to save the world he still committed an evil act and his alignment could change. Also I don't think he is evil if you take a realistic view of morality but I was looking at it in terms of D&D alignment rules since I am so used to thinking D&D whenever I hear (or read in this case) someone talking/writing about alignments.

I do want to make clear, since this is on the internet and there is no way that anyone would be able to tell the tone of my posts, that I am not angerly saying that my opinion is correct I am just presenting what I believe is evidence that he is Neutral Evil according to D&D 3.5 edition rules. I wanted to make this clear so that there are no misinterpretaions as to how I am saying it so that I don't offend someone because they think I a yelling at them over my posts.

R