Talk:Day 121-130/@comment-134.114.95.24-20150305163905/@comment-50.132.34.248-20150306141035


 * spoilers* You mention evil acts, and alignment being action based, but most of the evil he has done has been to control a group that IS evil. He tortured a group of goblins under a rebel leader because if he didn't he would likely have insubordinates. He had to make it clear what would happen if they hurt a group under his protection which is also a good act. The slaves issue is more evil, but if he didn't provide them himself we both know what his group would end up doing and that would end up being more cruel (and we don't need to elborate on this point). The people he rules over are evil and to control them he has to do evil himself, but that doesn't make him evil. *spoilers* The fact that he does good, like saving those adventurers recently, or saving the original 5 females or other small acts of kindness proves to me that he is a Neutral alignment even by DnD standards. A True Neurtal character can do both good and evil, will follow rules or break them just as easily. A True Neutral character can be just as likely to do anything, good or evil doesn't matter to them.

Now he did cannibalize some goblins, but with his ability who wouldn't be tempted to? When he was a human he ate evil espers, which I assume were mostly human espers. Considering that he has a damn good reason to eat everything I wouldn't consider this evil, besides his ability protects him from any potential ill affects of cannibalism, or eating anything. *spoilers*